| Tweet | ||

Photo courtesy of Vogue
Some French politicians are striking back against airbrushing, proposing a law that would require magazines to clearly mark altered photos as airbrushed. Fashion and beauty magazines, almost all of which use retouching heavily, claim the measure would stifle artistic interpretation. Tony Chambers, editor of Wallpaper and former editor of British GQ, stated flatly, “The camera has always lied and always will. These things should always be taken with a pinch of salt.”
Do you think his claim holds water? The provision wouldn’t prevent fashion magazines from using retouched photos. I certainly understand the argument that a good magazine spread can be an artistic vision, so just as I wouldn’t mind a painter blending paints on a canvas, I don’t mind magazines brushing out pores and blemishes. But when it comes to body retouching, something tells me that whittling waists and thighs in Photoshop isn’t going anywhere anytime soon, so I wouldn’t mind the boost of perspective that would come with being reminded that the image isn’t completely practical or achievable precisely because it isn’t quite real.
What do you think? Would you like a law like this in your country?







































--